Preliminary report: Understanding preferences and attitudes among university students in choosing a transportation mode

Reporte preliminar: Entendiendo las preferencias y actitudes al escoger el medio de transporte en estudiantes universitarios

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Carlos A. Mariño
Abstract
Transportation plays an important role in a society and understanding the travel behavior is crucial in order to provide a framework to planners and policymaker to shift toward more sustainable transportation mode. Capturing this behavior in university students have been the focus of attention in the past years. Developing countries has specific characteristics such rapid in traffic congestion, sprawl urban development, safety concerns and a high degree of informal transportation. This study was done in Lima, capital of Peru, and a survey was performed for freshmen and senior students at the San Ignacio de Loyola University. Factors relevant considered were time to commute, transportation mode awareness, safety and security. The findings clearly show the students’ preferences of the different modes clearly and provide insights regerding of transportation infrastructure needs, and potential possibilities to shift toward more sustainable modes.
Keywords

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Author Biography / See

Carlos A. Mariño, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Perú

Doctorando en Industrial and Systems Engineering, Bagley College of Engineering en Mississippi State University (EE.UU.); MSc. Engineering Management, California State University East Bay (EE.UU.), candidato a máster in Transportation and Logistics Management concentración in Reverse Logistics, magíster en Administración por la Universidad del Pacifico, ingeniero industrial por la Universidad de Lima y licenciado como Professional Engineer (PE) en el estado de California, EE.UU. Actualmente se desempeña como director de la Carrera de Ingeniería Logística y de Transporte en la USIL.
References / See

Beirao, G. & Sarsfield, J. (2007). Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: A qualitative study. Transport Policy, 14(6), pp. 478-489.

Discovery (2013). Driving in Lima: factoids-up. Recuperado el 20 de octubre del 2013, disponible en http://www.discovery.ca/article.aspx?aid=52319

Hidalgo, D. & Huizenga, C. (2013). Implementation of sustainable urban transport in Latin America. Research in transportation economics, 40(1), pp. 66-77.

INEI (2012). Accidentes de tránsito no fatales. Lima: INEI.

Keeling, D.J. (2013). Transport research challenges in Latin America. Journal of Transportation Geography, 29, 103-104.

Kutzbach, M.J. (2009). Motorization in developing countries: Causes, consequences, and effectiveness of policy options. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(2), pp. 154-166.

Lasmini, A.A. & Indriastuti, A.K. (2010). Travel pattern change due to urban sprawl in city of developing country. Journal of Mathematics & Technology, 4, pp. 46-50.

Municipalidad de Lima (marzo de 2008). Estadística: Gerencia de Transporte Urbano. Recuperado el 23 de octubre de 2013, disponible en http://www.gtu.munlima.gob.pe/transporte/estadistica1.htm

MTC (2012). Parque vehicular nacional estimado por años. Lima: Ministerio de Transportes y Comunicaciones.

Oellrich, M., Mantwill, F. (2012). Improved pairwise comparison. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 67, pp. 1390-1391.

Schneider, R. (2013). Theory of routine mode choice decisions: An operational framework to increase sustainable transportation. Transport Policy, 25, pp. 128-137.

Whalena, K.E., Páez, A., Carrasco, J.A. (2013). Mode choice of university students commuting to school and the role of active travel. Journal of Transport Geography, 31, pp.132-142.

Zhou, J. (2012). Sustainable commute in a car-dominant city: Factors affecting alternative mode choices among university students. Transportation Research, 46(11), pp. 1013-1029.

OJS System - Metabiblioteca |