A List of Research Problems Encountered in the Peer Review Process
A List of Research Problems Encountered in the Peer Review Process
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Baggs, J.G.; Broome, M.E.; Dougherty, M.C.; Freda, M.C. & Kearney, M.H. (2008). Blinding in peer review: the preferences of reviewers for nursing journals. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 64(2), 131-138.
Bornmann, L. & Daniel, H. (2009). Reviewer and editor biases in journal peer review: an investigation of manuscript refereeing at Angewandte Chemie International Edition. Research Evaluation, 18(4), 262-272.
Broome, M.; Dougherty, M.C.; Freda, M.C.; Kearney, M.H. & Baggs, J.G. (2010). Ethical concerns of nursing reviewers: An international survey. Nursing Ethics 17(6) 741-748.
Cummings, P. & Rivara, F.P. (2002). Responding to Reviewers’ Comments on Submitted Articles. Arch Pediatric Adolesc Med., 156(2), 105.
Fischer, C.C. (2011). A Value-Added Role for Reviewers in Enhancing the Quality of Published Research. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 42(2), 226-237.
Godlee, F. (2002). Making Reviewers Visible: Openness, Accountability, and Credit. Journal of the American Medical Association. 287(21), 2762-2765.
Happell, B. (2011). Responding to reviewers’ comments as part of writing for publication. Nurse Researcher, 18(4), 23-27.
Kearney, M.H.; Baggs, J.G.; Broome, M.E.; Dougherty, M.C. & Freda, M.C. (2008). Experience, Time Investment, and Motivators of Nursing Journal Peer Reviewers. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 40(4), 395-400.
Kleinert, S. (2008). Peer reviewers deserve recognition. Lancet 371 (9615), 798-798.
Kolasa, T. & Krol, D. (2011). A Survey of Algorithms for Paper-reviewer Assignment Problem. IETE Technical Review 28(2).
Kranish, M. (2005). Flaws are found in validating medical studies. The Boston Globe. 15 August 2005.
Lovejoy, T.I.; Revenson, T.A. & France, C.R. (2011). Reviewing Manuscripts for Peer-Review Journals: A Primer for Novice and Seasoned Reviewers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42(1), 1-13.
Un Jan, A. & Contreras, V. (2011). Technology acceptance model for the use of information technology I universities. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 845-851.
Wager, E.; Parkin, E.C. & Tamber, P.S. (2006). Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective study. BioMed Central BMC Medicine, 4(13).
Wang, F.; Shi, N. & Chen, B. (2010). A Comprehensive Survey of the Reviewer Assignment Problem. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 9(4), 645-668.
Wing, D.A.; Benner, R.S.; Petersen, R.; Newcomb, R. & Scott, J.R. (2010). Differences in Editorial Board Reviewer Behavior Based on Gender. Journal of Women’s Health, 19(10).
Zhang, Y.; Yuan, Y. & Jiang, Y. (2003). An international peer review system for a Chinese scientific journal. Learned Publishing, 16(2), 91-94.