Preparando a los estudiantes para la Generación Z: consideraciones sobre el currículo de impresión 3D
Getting ready for Generation Z students - considerations on 3D printing curriculum
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF
FLIP
PDF (English)
HTML
HTML (English)
PDF
FLIP
HTML
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Debido a que en todo el mundo se ha adoptado la impresión 3D (3DP) en muchas áreas de actividades, la educación formal se ha convertido en una solución obligatoria para adquirir el conocimiento teórico y a las habilidades prácticas para un uso eficiente, para brindar contribuciones reales al desarrollo de esta tecnología y sus aplicaciones. Los verdaderos nativos digitales, los estudiantes de la generación Z acceden ahora a la universidad. Los universitarios de la Generación Z reciben instrucción por parte de profesores que pertenecen a la Generación X y a los primeros representantes de la Generación Y. Estos profesores tienen que hacer frente al diferente conjunto de habilidades y mentalidades de la nueva generación de estudiantes, al igual que, en el caso de la impresión 3D, a una sobreexposición mediática de esta tecnología que genera una tendencia cada vez mayor de los jóvenes a la adquisición rápida de conocimientos superficiales y a la autosuficiencia. En este contexto, nuestras investigaciones examinan los retos y las implicaciones inherentes a los aspectos curriculares de la impresión 3D, ofreciendo una serie de consideraciones y análisis basados en el estudio de la literatura y en una larga experiencia en la enseñanza de esta materia en el ámbito de la ingeniería. Se presentaron también los resultados de un estudio que persigue comprender las expectativas de los estudiantes de la Generación Z de Rumania en relación con el aprendizaje y la enseñanza de la impresión 3D. Estamos de acuerdo con la idea de que la enseñanza debe ser adaptada a los conocimientos anteriores del estudiante, pues la personalización de esta en función de los rasgos de los alumnos no resulta ni práctica ni eficaz. Al mismo tiempo, consideramos que el conocimiento de las características de las nuevas generaciones, de sus hábitos de estudio y de sus preferencias como grupo, pueden, sin lugar a duda, orientar a los profesores a la hora de elegir las herramientas y los métodos adecuados en aras de mejorar la transmisión correcta del contenido y de garantizar que este llegue eficazmente a la audiencia.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Assunçao, E.G., Silva, E.R., & Pei, E. (2019). Professional Training of AM at the European Level. In: Pei E., Monzón M., Bernard A. (Eds), Additive Manufacturing – Developments in Training and Education. Springer, Cham.
Barnes & Noble Colleg. (2015). Getting to Know Gen Z: Exploring a New Generation's Expectations for Higher Education: New Research Provides Insights into the Characteristics of Future Students. Available at: https://next.bncollege.com/wp- content/uploads/2015/10/Gen-Z-Research-Report-Final.pdf
Correia, S. C. & Bozutti, D.F. (2017). Challenges and Difficulties to Teaching Engineering to Generation Z: a case research. Propósitos y Representaciones, 5(2), 127 -183. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2017.v5n2.163
Corbisiero, F., & Ruspini, E. (2018). Guest editorial. Journal of Tourism Futures, 4(1), 3-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JTF-03-2018-069
Cuellar, J. S., Smit, G., Plettenburg, D., & Zadpoor, A. (2018). Additive manufacturing of non- assembly mechanisms. Additive Manufacturing, 21, 150-158. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2018.02.004
Despeisse, M. & Minshall, T. (2017). Skills and Education for Additive Manufacturing: A Review of Emerging Issues. In: Lödding H., Riedel R., Thoben KD., von Cieminski G., Kiritsis D. (Eds), Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing. APMS 2017. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 513, Springer, Cham.
Diegel, O., Nordin, A., & Motte D. (2018). Teaching Design for Additive Manufacturing Through Problem-Based Learning. In: Pei E., Monzón M., Bernard A. (Eds) Additive Manufacturing – Developments in Training and Education. Springer, Cham
DiLullo, C. (2015). Learners of a New Generation. In Chan, L.K. & Pawlina, W. (Eds.), Teaching Anatomy: A Practical Guide, 11-21, Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. EOS Academy (2018). AM Training Portfolio. Available at https://cdn.eos.info/12a0083b67076d44/e9fc19c06c85/AdditiveMinds_Brochure_April2018_en_WEB.pdf
European Commission Executive Agency For Small And Medium-Sized Enterprises (2016). Identifying current and future application areas, existing industrial value chains and missing competences in the EU, in the area of additive manufacturing (3D-printing). available on http://ec.europa.eu/
Ford, S., & Minshall, T. (2017). 3D printing in teaching and education: A review of where and where and how it is used. Available at www.researchgate.net/publication/320617391_3D_printing_in_teaching_and_education_A_review_of_where_and_how_it_is_used
Go, J. & Hart, A.J. (2016). A framework for teaching the fundamentals of additive manufacturing and enabling rapid innovation, Additive. Manufacturing. 10, 76–87. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.001
Harvey, S.B. (2016). Teaching additive manufacturing in a higher education setting, AAEE2016 Conference, Coffs Harbour, Australia, 329-336.
Huang, Y., & Ming, L.C. (2014). Frontiers of Additive Manufacturing Research and Education Additive Manufacturing – Developments in Training and Education, An NSF Additive Manufacturing Workshop Report. Available at http://nsfam.mae.ufl.edu/2013nsfamworkshopreport.pdf
ISO/ASTM 52900:2015 – Additive Manufacturing. Terminology.
Jiang, R., Kleer, R., & Piller, F.T. (2017). Predicting the future of additive manufacturing: A Delphi study on economic and societal implications of 3D printing for 2030, Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 117, 84–97. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.006
Jonas-Dwyer, D., & Pospisil, R. (2004). The Millennials effect. Implications for academic development in Research and Development in Higher Education: Transforming Knowledge into Wisdom Holistic Approaches to Teaching and Learning, 27, 194-207. Available at http://www.herdsa.org.au/publications/conference-proceedings/research-and-development-higher-education-transforming-18
Klein, P. D. (2003). Rethinking the multiplicity of cognitive resources and curricular representations: alternatives to "learning styles" and "multiple intelligences. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 45-81. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210141891
Lalley, J.P., & Gentile, J.R. (2009). Adapting Instruction to Individuals: Based on the Evidence, What Should It Mean? International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(3), 462-475. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ869330
Manyika, J. L., Chui, M., Buglin, J., Dobbs, R., Bison, P., & Mars, A. (2013, May). Disruptive technologies: Advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute
Meister, J. C., & Willyerd, K. (2010). Mentoring Millennials. Harvard Business Review. 88(5), 68-72. Available at https://hbr.org/2010/05/mentoring-millennials
Milewski, J.O. (2017). Additive Manufacturing Metal, the Art of the Possible. Additive Manufacturing of Metals, 7-33. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58205-4_2
MIT Professional Education, Additive Manufacturing: From 3D Printing to the factory floor (2018). Available at http://professional.mit.edu/programs/short-programs/additive-manufacturing
Monaco, M., & Martin, M. (2007). The millennial student: A new generation of learners. Athletic Training Education Journal, 2(2), 42-46. Available at https://www.learntechlib.org/p/158826/
Moore, K., Jones, C., & Frazier R.S., (2017). Engineering Education for Generation Z. American Journal of Engineering Education, 8(2), 111-126. Available at https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1162924
Nemorin, S. (2017). The frustrations of digital fabrication: an auto/ethnographic exploration of 3D Making in school. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 27(4), 578-59. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9366-z
Paudel, A.M., & Kalla, D.K. (2016). Direct Digital Manufacturing Course into Mechanical Engineering Technology Curriculum, in: ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., ASEE, New Orleans, USA. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18260/p.26848
Pew Research Center, Millennials - Pew Social Trends. Available at http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2010/02/24/millennials-confident-connected-open-to-change/
Radharamanan, R. (2017). Additive Manufacturing in Manufacturing Education: A New Course Development and Implementation, In: ASEE Annu. Conf. Expo., ASEE, Columbus, USA.
Roberts, D. H., Newman, L.R., & Schwartzstein, R. M. (2012). Twelve tips for facilitating Millennials' learning. Medical Teacher, 34(4), 274-278. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2011.613498
Roca, J. B., Vaishnav, P., Mendonca, J., & Granger, M. (2017). Getting past the hype about 3D Printing. MIT Sloan Management Review, 52(3), 56-62. Available at http://ilp.mit.edu/media/news_articles/smr/2017/58323.pdf
Shatto, B., & Erwin, K. (2016). Moving on from Millennials: Preparing for Generation Z. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 47(6), 253–254. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3928/00220124-20160518-05
Shuman, L.J., Besterfield-Sacre, M., & McGourty, J. (2005). The ABET "Professional skills" - Can they be taught? Can they be assessed? Journal of Engineering Education. 94, 41-55. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00828.x
Stratasys (2016), Introduction to 3D Printing Curriculum. Available at http://www.stratasys.com/resources/search/education-materials/download-introduction-3d-printing-curriculum
Swanzen, R. (2018). Facing the generation chasm: the parenting and teaching of generations Y and Z. International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies, 9(2), 125-150. Doi: https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs92201818216
Thomas, M. (Ed.) (2011), Deconstructing Digital Natives: Young People, Technology and the New Literacies, Routledge, New York, NY.
Training in 3D Printing to foster EU innovation and creativity (2018), 3D Printing Curriculum. Available at https://3d-p.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/IO2_Curricula-of-3DP-course.pdf (accessed May 13th 2018)
Vandevelde, C., Wyffels, F., Ciocci, MC. et al. (2016). Design and evaluation of a DIY construction system for educational robot kits. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26, 521-540. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9324-1
Williams, C.B., & Seepersad, C.C. (2012). Design for Additive Manufacturing Curriculum: A Problem ‐ and Project‐ Based Approach, in: 23rd Annu. Int. Solid Free. Fabr. Symp., Laboratory for Freeform Fabrication and University of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA, 81–92.
Willingham, D. T. (2003). Why students think they understand--when they don't. American Educator, 48, 38-41. Available at http://www.math.jhu.edu/~wsw/whentheydont.html
Willingham, D. T. (2005). Do visual, auditory, and kinesthetic learners need visual, auditory, and kinesthetic instruction? American Educator, 29, 31-35. Available at https://www.aft.org/ae/summer2005/willingham
