Cognitive and Self-regulation Strategies, Academic Engagement and Academic Achievement in Higher Education Students. The Mediating Role of Reading Comprehension
Estrategias cognitivas y de autorregulación, engagement académico y rendimiento académico en estudiantes del nivel superior. El rol mediador de la comprensión lectora
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
PDF
XML (Español (España))
PDF (Español (España))
FLIP
XML (Español (España))
XML
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between students’ cognitive and self-regulatory strategies, academic engagement, and academic achievement in higher education, analyzing the mediating role of reading comprehension. Different tasks to assess the constructs were administered to 209 students (Mage = 21.71; SD = 4.36). The students' GPA was used as a measure of academic achievement. Significant associations were found between cognitive and self-regulation strategies, academic engagement, reading comprehension, and students' GPA. In addition, a positive association was found between cognitive and self-regulation strategies and academic engagement. Finally, the structural equation model showed that cognitive and self-regulation strategies and academic engagement have direct effects on students' GPA. Additionally, an indirect effect of cognitive and self-regulation strategies on academic achievement was observed through reading comprehension. The implications of the study are discussed in terms of the importance of promoting the recognition and implementation of students' own cognitive and metacognitive strategies and engagement, in order to improve their academic achievement in higher education.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Alegre, A. (2014). Academic self-efficacy, self-regulated learning and academic performance in first-year university students. Propósitos y Representaciones, 2(1), 79-120. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2014.v2n1.54
Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: an overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualisations. International Education Studies, 9(12), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41
Arán-Filippetti, V., & Krumm, G. (2020). A hierarchical model of cognitive flexibility in children: Extending the relationship between flexibility, creativity and academic achievement. Child Neuropsychology, 26, 770-800. https://doi.org/10.1080/09297049.2019.1711034
Arán-Filippetti, V., & López, M. B. (2016). Funciones ejecutivas y comprensión lectora. Cuadernos de Neuropsicología, 10(1), 23-44. https://doi.org/10.7714/CNPS/10.1.202
Arbuckle, J. L. (2007). Amos 16.0 user’s guide. Amos Development Corporation.
Arias-Gundín, O., Fidalgo, R., & Robledo, P. (2012). Metacognición y comprensión lectora: conocimiento y uso de estrategias. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 195-201. https://hdl.handle.net/10662/2709
Bastug, M. (2014). The structural relationship of reading attitude, reading comprehension and academic achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 4(4), 931-946. https://ijsse.com/sites/default/files/issues/2014/v4-i4-2014-1/Paper-20.pdf
Bharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32, 205-214
Becker, D. R., Miao, A., Duncan, R., & McClelland, M. M. (2014). Behavioral self-regulation and executive function both predict visuomotor skills and early academic achievement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(4), 411-424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.04.014
Boekaerts, M. (2016). Engagement as an inherent aspect of the learning process. Learning and Instruction, 43, 76-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.001
Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 477-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010
Castañeda, S., Pérez, I., & Peña, R. (2016). Validación de constructo de componentes de agencia académica evaluados en web. Revista de Investigación en Psicología, 19(2), 9-24. https://doi.org/10.15381/rinvp.v19i2.12887
Casuso-Holgado, M. J., Cuesta-Vargas, A. I., Moreno-Morales, N., Labajos-Manzanares, M. T., Barón-López, F. J., & Vega-Cuesta, M. (2013). The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students. BMC Medical Education, 13(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-33
Chavez, A., & Vallejos-Flores, M. A. (2021). Diseño y validez de la Escala de Adicción a Instagram de Bergen (BIAS) en adultos peruanos. Propósitos y Representaciones, 9(1), e973. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9n1.973
Difabio, H. (2008). El test cloze en la evaluación de la comprensión del texto informativo de nivel universitario. RLA. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada, 46(1), 121-137. https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0718-48832008000100007
Elvira-Valdés, M. A., & Pujol, L. (2012). Autorregulación y rendimiento académico en la transición secundaria-universidad. Revista Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, Niñez y Juventud, 10(1), 367-378. https://revistaumanizales.cinde.org.co/rlcsnj/index.php/Revista-Latinoamericana/article/view/612
Ernst, C., Arán Filippetti, V., & Lemos, V. (2022). Estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico: revisión sistemática en estudiantes del nivel secundario y universitario. Uniandes Episteme, 9(4), 534-562. http://45.238.216.13/ojs/index.php/EPISTEME/article/view/2737/2224
Estévez, I., Rodríguez-Llorente, C., Piñeiro, I., González-Suárez, R., & Valle, A. (2021). School engagement, academic achievement, and self-regulated learning. Sustainability, 13(6), 3011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063011
Fechheimer, M., Webber, K., & Kleiber, P. B. (2011). How well do undergraduate research programs promote engagement and success of students?. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 10(2), 156-163. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.10-10-0130
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543059002117
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
García-Madruga, J. A., Vila, J. O., Gómez-Veiga, I., Duque, G., & Elosúa, M. R. (2014). Executive processes, reading comprehension and academic achievement in 3th grade primary students. Learning and Individual Differences, 35, 41-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.07.013
Gaxiola, J. C., Lugo, S., & Gaxiola, E. (2013). Autorregulación, resiliencia y metas educativas: variables protectoras del rendimiento académico de bachilleres. Revista Colombiana de Psicología, 22(2), 241-252. http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/rcps/v22n2/v22n2a02.pdf
Gómez H., P., Pérez, V. C., Parra, P. P., Ortiz, M. L., Matus, B. O., McColl, C. P., ... & Meyer, K. A. (2015). Relación entre el bienestar y el rendimiento académico en alumnos de primer año de medicina. Revista Médica de Chile, 143(7), 930-937. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872015000700015
Gunuc, S. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and their academic achievement. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 5(4), 216-231. http://ijonte.org/FileUpload/ks63207/File/19..gunuc.pdf
Gutierrez-Braojos, C., & Salmerón, H. (2012). Estrategias de comprensión lectora para estudiantes de primer grado de educación primaria. Profesorado: Revista de Currículum y Formación del Profesorado, 6(1), 183-202. https://hdl.handle.net/10481/23007
Heng, K. (2014). The relationships between student engagement and the academic achievement of first-year university students in Cambodia. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(2), 179-189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0095-8
Hernández-Sampieri, R., & Mendoza, C. (2020). Metodología de la investigación: las rutas cuantitativa, cualitativa y mixta. Mcgraw-Hill.
Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(3), 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.01.006
Hughes, R., & Pace, C. R. (2003). Using NSSE to study student retention and withdrawal. Assessment Update, 15(4), 1-2.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 76-99). Sage.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kohler, J. L. (2013). Rendimiento académico, habilidades intelectuales y estrategias de aprendizaje en universitarios de Lima. Liberabit, 19(2), 277-288. http://www.scielo.org.pe/pdf/liber/v19n2/a13v19n2
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: an International Journal, 46(3), 517-528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Li, S., & Lajoie, S. P. (2021). Cognitive engagement in self-regulated learning: an integrative model. European Journal of Psychology of Education (IF2.663). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10212-021-00565-X
Martín, E., García, L. A., Torbay, Á., & Rodríguez, T. (2008). Estrategias de aprendizaje y rendimiento académico en estudiantes universitarios. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 8(3), 401-412. https://www.ijpsy.com/volumen8/num3/213/estrategias-de-aprendizaje-y-rendimiento-ES.pdf
McClelland, M. M., & Cameron, C. E. (2011). Self‐regulation and academic achievement in elementary school children. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011(133), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cd.302
McKeachie, W. J., Pintrich, P. R., Lin, Y. G., & Smith, D. (1986). Teaching and learning in the college classroom: A review of the research literature. Ann Arbor: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Literacy, The University of Michigan. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED314999.pdf
Medrano, L. A., Moretti, L., & Ortiz, A. (2015). Medición del engagement académico en estudiantes universitarios. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación-e Avaliação Psicológica, 2(40), 114-124. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/4596/459645432012.pdf
Mesurado, B., Richaud, M. C., & José Mateo, N. (2016). Engagement, flow, self-efficacy, and eustress of university students: A cross-national comparison between the Philippines and Argentina. The Journal of Psychology, 150(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1024595
Moje, E. B., Stockdill, D., Kim, K., & Kim, H. J. (2011). The role of text in disciplinary learning. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. IV, pp. 453-486). Routledge.
Morrison, F. J., Ponitz, C. C., & McClelland, M. M. (2010). Self-regulation and academic achievement in the transition to school. In S. D. Calkins & M. A. Bell (Eds.), Child development at the intersection of emotion and cognition (pp. 203-224). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12059-011
Nejabati, N. (2015). The effects of teaching self-regulated learning strategies on EFL students' reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(6), 1343-1348. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0606.23
Northey, G., Govind, R., Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., Dolan, R., & van Esch, P. (2018). The effect of “here and now” learning on student engagement and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), 321-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12589
Oliveira, K. L., & Dos Santos, A. A. A. (2006). Compreensão de textos e desempenho acadêmico. PSIC Revista de Psicología da Vetor Editora, 7(1), 19-27. http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/psic/v7n1/v7n1a04.pdf
Peralbo, M., Porto, A., Barca, A., Risso, A., Mayor, M. A., & García, M. (2009). Comprensión lectora y rendimiento escolar: cómo mejorar la comprensión de textos en secundaria obligatoria. In Actas do X Congresso Internacional Galego-Português de Psicopedagogia (pp. 4127-4142). Braga: Universidade do Minho. https://www.educacion.udc.es/grupos/gipdae/documentos/congreso/xcongreso/pdfs/t9/t9c305.pdf
Pinto, N. S., Martínez, A. I. M., & Jiménez-Taracido, L. (2016). Learning strategies, reading comprehension and academic achievement in Secondary Education. Psicologia Escolar e Educacional, 20(3), 447-456. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3539201502031101
Pretorius, E. J. (2002). Reading ability and academic performance in South Africa: Are we fiddling while Rome is burning? Language Matters, 33(1), 169-196. https://doi.org/10.1080/10228190208566183
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3, 71-92.
Serrano, C., Andreu, Y., Murgui, S., & Martínez, P. (2019). Psychometric properties of Spanish version student Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (UWES-S-9) in high-school students. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 22. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2019.25
Soper, D. (2020). A-priori Calculadora de tamaño de muestra para modelos de ecuaciones estructurales 2020. Free Statistics Calculators. https://www.danielsoper.com/statcalc
Svanum, S., & Bigatti, S. M. (2009). Academic course engagement during one semester forecasts college success: Engaged students are more likely to earn a degree, do it faster, and do it better. Journal of College Student Development, 50(1), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1353/csd.0.0055
Valle, A., Rodríguez, S., Cabanach, R. G., Núñez, J. C., González- Pienda, J. A., & Rosário, P. (2009). Diferencias en rendimiento académico según los niveles de las estrategias cognitivas y de las estrategias de autorregulación. SUMMA Psicológica UST, 6(2), 31-42. https://doi.org/10.18774/448x.2009.6.60
Ventura-León, J., Caycho, T. & Barboza, M. (2020). ¿Cuántos participantes son necesarios?: Un método para estimar el tamaño muestral en SEM. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría, 118(5), e510- e513.
Weinstein, C. E., Acee, T. W., & Jung, J. (2011). Self‐regulation and learning strategies. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 126, 45-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.443
Wingate, U. (2007). A framework for transition: Supporting ‘learning to learn’ in higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(3), 391-405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2007.00361.x
Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk, & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 1-30). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
