Propiedades psicométricas e invarianza del Cuestionario Habilidades Comunicativas (HABICOM) en universitarios peruanos
Psychometric Properties and Invariance of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (HABICOM) in Peruvian University Students
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (HABICOM). The sample consisted of 774 students from a state university in Arequipa. The factors were analyzed and confirmed as in the original study, obtaining satisfactory fit indices in its two subscales Personal Self-perception (c2 = 1977.683, gl = 499, p < .001; CFI = .945; TLI: .939; RMSEA = .061; SRMR = .042) and Professional Importance (c2 = 2534. 513, gl = 517, p < .001; CFI = .926; TLI = .919; RMSEA = .070; SRMR = .049) with adequate reliability indices on both subscales, for Personal Self-Perception (α = .63 and α = .85) and Professional Importance (α = .91 and α = .77) respectively. Gender invariance was adequate for the Personal Self-perception subscale; however, this did not occur for the Professional Importance subscale. The HABICOM questionnaire in general is adequate to measure communication skills in Peruvian university students.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties and gender invariance of the Communication Skills Questionnaire (HABICOM). The sample consisted of 774 students from a state university in Arequipa. The factors were analyzed and confirmed as in the original study, obtaining satisfactory fit indices in its two subscales Personal Self-perception (c2 = 1977.683, gl = 499, p < .001; CFI = .945; TLI: .939; RMSEA = .061; SRMR = .042) and Professional Importance (c2 = 2534. 513, gl = 517, p < .001; CFI = .926; TLI = .919; RMSEA = .070; SRMR = .049) with adequate reliability indices on both subscales, for Personal Self-Perception (α = .63 and α = .85) and Professional Importance (α = .91 and α = .77) respectively. Gender invariance was adequate for the Personal Self-perception subscale; however, this did not occur for the Professional Importance subscale. The HABICOM questionnaire in general is adequate to measure communication skills in Peruvian university students.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Ato, M., López-García, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en psicología. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 29(3), 1038–1059. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.29.3.178511
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464-504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834
Epskamp, S., Stuber, S., Nak, J., Veenman, M., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2019). semPlot: Path Diagrams and Visual Analysis of Various SEM Packages’ Output (1.1.2) [Computer software]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=semPlot
Hernández-Jorge, C., & De la Rosa, C. M. (2018). Habilidades comunicativas en estudiantes de carreras de apoyo frente a estudiantes de otras carreras. Apuntes De Psicología, 35(2), 93–104. Recuperado a partir de https://www.apuntesdepsicologia.es/index.php/revista/article/view/663
Keith, T. Z. (2015). Multiple Regression and Beyond: An Introduction to Multiple Regression and Structural Equation Modeling (2da ed.). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://www.routledge.com/Multiple-Regression-and-Beyond-An-Introduction-to-Multiple-Regression-and/Keith/p/book/9781138061446
O´Connor, J. (1999). PNL para Formadores. Ediciones Urano.
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.r-project.org/
Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
RStudio Team. (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA. https://rstudio.com/
Svetina, D., Rutkowski, L., & Rutkowski, D. (2019). Multiple-Group Invariance with Categorical Outcomes Using Updated Guidelines: An Illustration Using M plus and the lavaan/semTools Packages. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 27(1), 111-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2019.1602776
Tejera, J. F., & Cardoso, M. A. (2015). Tratamiento de las habilidades comunicativas en el contexto universitario. Revista Universidad y Sociedad, 7(2), 168- 172. https://bit.ly/2EAr9YO
Valencia-Naranjo, N., & Robles-Bello, M. A. (2022). Habilidades comunicativas y de relación en la educación superior de disciplinas dirigidas al asesoramiento. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana De Educación a Distancia, 25(1), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.25.1.31327
Viktorovna, N., Aleksandrovna, E., Viktorovich, A., & Alexandrovna, N. (2021). Social Partnership: The Development of Soft Skills In Young People In Regions. Propósitos Y Representaciones, 9(SPE3), e1274. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE3.1274